Therapies to Improve Vein Graft Patency After CABG - American College of Cardiology (2023)

Introduction
CABG is the most commonly performed cardiac surgical procedure worldwide and is preferred over percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with diabetes, reduced left ventricular ejection fraction, and three vessel and complex coronary artery disease.¹ Both arterial and saphenous vein grafts (SVG) can be used as conduits. Grafting the left anterior descending artery with the left internal thoracic artery is the gold standard in CABG because patency rates of this construction surpass SVG,² decrease the incidence of coronary reoperation, and improve survival.^3,4 Use of multiple arterial grafts, compared to only a single arterial graft, potentially provides long-term survival benefit in selected patients, but this remains a topic for discussion. As such, SVG remains the most used second conduit. An important and recalcitrant issue with the use of SVG remains vein graft failure. SVG failure rates range from 6% to 26% in the first year and are estimated to be 40-50% at 10 years after CABG.^5,6 Although SVG failure is not one-on-one related with adverse events, it is associated with anginal complaints, myocardial infarction, and long-term mortality after CABG.^7-9 This article discusses therapies to improve vein graft patency after CABG.

Pathophysiology
SVG failure is a complex, multifactorial process. In the first month after CABG, mechanical factors and endothelial damage after surgery cause thrombotic occlusion.¹⁰ Thereafter, until 1 year after CABG, the predominant process causing failure is intimal hyperplasia. Activated platelets trigger inflammation, causing smooth muscle cell migration from the media to the intima.¹¹ Both thrombosis and intimal hyperplasia provide the foundation for accelerated atherosclerosis, which is the principal cause of failure beyond the first year after CABG.¹²

Technical Improvements
Technical improvements in SVG construction during CABG should be taken into account to improve vein graft patency. Regarding SVG harvest and preservation, early studies showed reduced patency rates for endoscopic vein harvesting compared with the conventional open harvest technique,¹³ although a recent clinical trial that included 1,150 patients demonstrated no difference in major adverse cardiac events between the endoscopic-harvest group and the open-harvest group at a median follow-up of 2.8 years.¹⁴ A small randomized controlled trial that included 54 patients demonstrated that the "no-touch technique" for SVG harvesting is superior to conventional harvesting and provides long-term patency rates that are comparable with the left internal thoracic artery.¹⁵ SVG preservation in buffered solutions preserves intimal integrity and can improve patency over grafts preserved in normal saline or blood-based solutions.¹⁶ The appropriate length of the SVG is of importance to avoid both overstretching and kinking¹⁷ and to preserve good target runoff.¹⁸ Measuring intraoperative graft flow potentially identifies technical problems with the anastomoses and outflow targets, thus identifying the need for revision to improve early graft patency.¹⁹ Some studies report sequential grafting providing inferior patency rates compared with single grafts,²⁰ although as many studies report no difference between both strategies.²¹ Additionally, the risk for competitive (native coronary) flow causing reduction or even reversal of graft flow when grafting less then high-grade stenotic coronary arteries is less important in SVG than in arterial grafts and has to be taken in consideration when planning the revascularization.²² Furthermore, competitive flow presumably has more impact in sequential grafts including Y- or T-constructions. Last, off-pump CABG has been reported to be associated with inferior patency rates,²³ although the current consensus is that in experienced hands, both off-pump and on-pump CABG attain excellent clinical outcomes in most patients.

Postoperative Therapies

Lifestyle
Lifestyle and behavioral factors are associated with risk for SVG failure. It is established that smoking¹⁸ and hyperlipidaemia²⁴ are associated with SVG failure. Diabetes and probably hypertension influence graft occlusion after CABG,^25,26 and management of both decreases adverse clinical events.^27,28 Therefore, addressing risk factors by adequate secondary prevention remains the cornerstone of strategies to improve graft patency.

Antithrombotic Therapies
SVG failure is up to five times more frequent in patients who are not treated with aspirin postoperatively,²⁹ and early postoperative use is associated with a reduced risk of death and ischemic complications, albeit with a slight increase in perioperative bleeding.^30,31 Therefore, guidelines recommend the preoperative or early postoperative use of aspirin.^1,32,33 More potent platelet inhibition could potentially provide better patency after CABG. However, studies investigating additional antithrombotic therapies after CABG have not provided definite conclusions. Addition of dipyridamole does not appear to improve SVG patency³⁴ and might lead to worse clinical outcomes after CABG³⁵; therefore, it is not recommended.^32,33

The addition of the P2Y12 inhibitor clopidogrel to aspirin did not improve SVG patency in certain studies,⁵ whereas in others it showed better SVG patency.³⁶ This may be due to 30% of patients having an inadequate inhibitory response to clopidogrel. Nonetheless, addition of the stronger P2Y12 inhibitor ticagrelor to aspirin does not conclusively render better SVG patency,^37,38 although ticagrelor has hardly any variability in response.

Oral anticoagulation provides no improvement in SVG patency rates compared with aspirin,^39,40 but it causes more bleeding complications.⁴⁰ Guidelines therefore advise against routinely administering vitamin K antagonists in patients undergoing CABG without other indications for vitamin K antagonists.³³ There is currently only limited evidence concerning the effect of novel oral anticoagulants after CABG. The recent COMPASS (Cardiovascular Outcomes for People Using Anticoagulation Strategies) CABG substudy (n = 1,448 patients) did not show an effect on graft patency of rivaroxaban plus aspirin compared with rivaroxaban monotherapy or aspirin monotherapy.⁴¹

Lipid-Lowering Therapies
Statin therapy reduces SVG occlusion rates as well as adverse events after CABG.^42,43 Guidelines recommend statin therapy in all patients with diagnosed coronary artery disease,¹ and in patients undergoing CABG, statin therapy is to be initiated preoperatively and continued for life.¹ Addition of ezetimibe in patients with prior CABG might amplify the clinical benefits of statin therapy,⁴⁴ as might treatment with PCSK9 inhibitors,⁴⁵ although more definite conclusions regarding the effect on SVG patency are awaited (NCT03900026, NCT03542110).

Other Therapies
Applying external support on the outer surface of the SVG by using an external stent targets factors such as high wall tension and disturbed flow patterns, which could lead to deterioration of the graft. This technique of external stenting is promising for preventing intimal hyperplasia and improving SVG patency.⁴⁶ New techniques like immunomodulation⁴⁷ and gene therapy⁶ are currently being investigated.

Conclusion
SVG failure is a complex, multifactorial process and is related to adverse outcomes after CABG. SVG occlusion rates are around 11% at 1 year after CABG. Technical factors during surgery and SVG construction are important in optimizing SVG patency. Secondary prevention aimed at preserving SVG patency should address risk factors for SVG failure and include antithrombotic therapy with aspirin and lipid-lowering therapies. Attempts to further improve SVG patency have resulted in the development of promising new targets, such as external stenting of the SVG.

References

1. Hillis LD, Smith PK, Anderson JL, et al. 2011 ACCF/AHA Guideline for Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery. A report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. Developed in collaboration with the American Association for Thoracic Surgery, Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists, and Society of Thoracic Surgeons. J Am Coll Cardiol 2011;58:e123-e210.
2. Goldman S, Zadina K, Moritz T, et al. Long-term patency of saphenous vein and left internal mammary artery grafts after coronary artery bypass surgery: results from a Department of Veterans Affairs Cooperative Study. J Am Coll Cardiol 2004;44:2149-56.
3. Sabik JF 3rd, Blackstone EH, Gillinov AM, Banbury MK, Smedira NG, Lytle BW. Influence of patient characteristics and arterial grafts on freedom from coronary reoperation. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2006;131:90-8.
4. Boylan MJ, Lytle BW, Loop FD, et al. Surgical treatment of isolated left anterior descending coronary stenosis. Comparison of left internal mammary artery and venous autograft at 18 to 20 years of follow-up. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1994;107:657-62.
5. Kulik A, Le May MR, Voisine P, et al. Aspirin plus clopidogrel versus aspirin alone after coronary artery bypass grafting: the clopidogrel after surgery for coronary artery disease (CASCADE) Trial. Circulation 2010;122:2680-7.
6. Alexander JH, Hafley G, Harrington RA, et al. Efficacy and safety of edifoligide, an E2F transcription factor decoy, for prevention of vein graft failure following coronary artery bypass graft surgery: PREVENT IV: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2005;294:2446-54.
7. Cameron AA, Davis KB, Rogers WJ. Recurrence of angina after coronary artery bypass surgery: predictors and prognosis (CASS Registry). Coronary Artery Surgery Study. J Am Coll Cardiol 1995;26:895-9.
8. Halabi AR, Alexander JH, Shaw LK, et al. Relation of early saphenous vein graft failure to outcomes following coronary artery bypass surgery. Am J Cardiol 2005;96:1254-9.
9. Fitzgibbon GM, Kafka HP, Leach AJ, Keon WJ, Hooper GD, Burton JR. Coronary bypass graft fate and patient outcome: angiographic follow-up of 5,065 grafts related to survival and reoperation in 1,388 patients during 25 years. J Am Coll Cardiol 1996;28:616-26.
10. Gaudino M, Antoniades C, Benedetto U, et al. Mechanisms, Consequences, and Prevention of Coronary Graft Failure. Circulation 2017;136:1749-64.
11. Mitra AK, Gangahar DM, Agrawal DK. Cellular, molecular and immunological mechanisms in the pathophysiology of vein graft intimal hyperplasia. Immunol Cell Biol 2006;84:115-24.
12. Boyle EM Jr, Lille ST, Allaire E, Clowes AW, Verrier ED. Endothelial cell injury in cardiovascular surgery: atherosclerosis. Ann Thorac Surg 1997;63:885-94.
13. Hess CN, Lopes RD, Gibson CM, et al. Saphenous vein graft failure after coronary artery bypass surgery: insights from PREVENT IV. Circulation 2014;130:1445-51.
14. Zenati MA, Bhatt DL, Bakaeen FG, et al. Randomized Trial of Endoscopic or Open Vein-Graft Harvesting for Coronary-Artery Bypass. N Engl J Med 2019;380:132-41.
15. Samano N, Geijer H, Liden M, Fremes S, Bodin L, Souza D. The no-touch saphenous vein for coronary artery bypass grafting maintains a patency, after 16 years, comparable to the left internal thoracic artery: A randomized trial. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2015;150:880-8.
16. Harskamp RE, Alexander JH, Schulte PJ, et al. Vein graft preservation solutions, patency, and outcomes after coronary artery bypass graft surgery: follow-up from the PREVENT IV randomized clinical trial. JAMA Surg 2014;149:798-805.
17. Sabik JF 3rd. Understanding saphenous vein graft patency. Circulation 2011;124:273-5.
18. Harskamp RE, Lopes RD, Baisden CE, de Winter RJ, Alexander JH. Saphenous vein graft failure after coronary artery bypass surgery: pathophysiology, management, and future directions. Ann Surg 2013;257:824-33.
19. Thuijs DJFM, Bekker MWA, Taggart DP, et al. Improving coronary artery bypass grafting: a systematic review and meta-analysis on the impact of adopting transit-time flow measurement. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2019;56:654-33.
20. Mehta RH, Ferguson TB, Lopes RD, et al. Saphenous vein grafts with multiple versus single distal targets in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery: one-year graft failure and five-year outcomes from the Project of Ex-Vivo Vein Graft Engineering via Transfection (PREVENT) IV trial. Circulation 2011;124:280-8.
21. Ouzounian M, Hassan A, Yip AM, et al. The impact of sequential grafting on clinical outcomes following coronary artery bypass grafting. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2010;38:579-84.
22. Pagni S, Storey J, Ballen J, et al. ITA versus SVG: a comparison of instantaneous pressure and flow dynamics during competitive flow. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 1997;11:1086-92.
23. Sellke FW, DiMaio JM, Caplan LR, et al. Comparing on-pump and off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting: numerous studies but few conclusions: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association council on cardiovascular surgery and anesthesia in collaboration with the interdisciplinary working group on quality of care and outcomes research. Circulation 2005;111:2858-64.
24. Daida H, Yokoi H, Miyano H, et al. Relation of saphenous vein graft obstruction to serum cholesterol levels. J Am Coll Cardiol 1995;25:193-7.
25. Desai ND, Naylor CD, Kiss A, et al. Impact of patient and target-vessel characteristics on arterial and venous bypass graft patency: insight from a randomized trial. Circulation 2007;115:684-91.
26. Une D, Kulik A, Voisine P, Le May M, Ruel M. Correlates of saphenous vein graft hyperplasia and occlusion 1 year after coronary artery bypass grafting: analysis from the CASCADE randomized trial. Circulation 2013;128:S213-S218.
27. Zhang H, Yuan X, Zhang H, et al. Efficacy of Long-Term β-Blocker Therapy for Secondary Prevention of Long-Term Outcomes After Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Surgery. Circulation 2015;131:2194-201.
28. Holman RR, Paul SK, Bethel MA, Matthews DR, Neil HAW. 10-year follow-up of intensive glucose control in type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med 2008;359:1577-89.
29. Zimmermann N, Gams E, Hohlfeld T. Aspirin in coronary artery bypass surgery: new aspects of and alternatives for an old antithrombotic agent. 2008;34:93-108.
30. Mangano DT, Multicenter Study of Perioperative Ischemia Research Group. Aspirin and mortality from coronary bypass surgery. N Engl J Med 2002;347:1309-17.
31. Hastings S, Myles P, McIlroy D. Aspirin and coronary artery surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Anaesth 2015;115:376-85.
32. Ferraris VA, Saha SP, Oestreich JH, et al. 2012 update to the Society of Thoracic Surgeons guideline on use of antiplatelet drugs in patients having cardiac and noncardiac operations. Ann Thorac Surg 2012;94:1761-81.
33. Stein PD, Schünemann HJ, Dalen JE, Gutterman D. Antithrombotic therapy in patients with saphenous vein and internal mammary artery bypass grafts: the Seventh ACCP Conference on Antithrombotic and Thrombolytic Therapy. Chest 2004;126:600S-608S.
34. Goldman S, Copeland J, Moritz T, et al. Saphenous vein graft patency 1 year after coronary artery bypass surgery and effects of antiplatelet therapy. Results of a Veterans Administration Cooperative Study. Circulation 1989;80:1190-7.
35. van der Meer J, Brutel de la Rivière A, van Gilst WH, et al. Effects of low dose aspirin (50 mg/day), low dose aspirin plus dipyridamole, and oral anticoagulant agents after internal mammary artery bypass grafting: patency and clinical outcome at 1 year. CABADAS Research Group of the Interuniversity Cardiology Institute of The Netherlands. Prevention of Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Occlusion by Aspirin, Dipyridamole and Acenocoumarol/Phenprocoumon Study. J Am Coll Cardiol 1994;24:1181-8.
36. Gao G, Zheng Z, Pi Y, Lu B, Lu J, Hu S. Aspirin plus clopidogrel therapy increases early venous graft patency after coronary artery bypass surgery a single-center, randomized, controlled trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 2010;56:1639-43.
37. Zhao Q, Zhu Y, Xu Z, et al. Effect of Ticagrelor Plus Aspirin, Ticagrelor Alone, or Aspirin Alone on Saphenous Vein Graft Patency 1 Year After Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA 2018;319:1677-86.
38. Willemsen LM, Janssen PWA, Peper J, et al. Effect of Adding Ticagrelor to Standard Aspirin on Saphenous Vein Graft Patency in Patients Undergoing Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting (POPular CABG): A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial. Circulation 2020;142:1799-807.
39. van der Meer J, Hillege HL, Kootstra GJ, et al. Prevention of one-year vein-graft occlusion after aortocoronary-bypass surgery: a comparison of low-dose aspirin, low-dose aspirin plus dipyridamole, and oral anticoagulants. The CABADAS Research Group of the Interuniversity Cardiology Institute of The Netherlands. Lancet 1993;342:257-64.
40. Pfisterer M, Burkart F, Jockers G, et al. Trial of low-dose aspirin plus dipyridamole versus anticoagulants for prevention of aortocoronary vein graft occlusion. Lancet 1989;2:1-7.
41. Lamy A, Eikelboom J, Sheth T, et al. Rivaroxaban, Aspirin, or Both to Prevent Early Coronary Bypass Graft Occlusion: The COMPASS-CABG Study. J Am Coll Cardiol 2019;73:121-30.
42. Post Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Trial Investigators. The effect of aggressive lowering of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels and low-dose anticoagulation on obstructive changes in saphenous-vein coronary-artery bypass grafts. N Engl J Med 1997;336:153-62.
43. Liakopoulos OJ, Choi YH, Haldenwang PL, et al. Impact of preoperative statin therapy on adverse postoperative outcomes in patients undergoing cardiac surgery: a meta-analysis of over 30,000 patients. Eur Heart J 2008;29:1548-59.
44. Eisen A, Cannon CP, Blazing MA, et al. The benefit of adding ezetimibe to statin therapy in patients with prior coronary artery bypass graft surgery and acute coronary syndrome in the IMPROVE-IT trial. Eur Heart J 2016;37:3576-84.
45. Goodman SG, Aylward PE, Szarek M, et al. Effects of Alirocumab on Cardiovascular Events After Coronary Bypass Surgery. J Am Coll Cardiol 2019;74:1177-86.
46. Taggart DP, Webb CM, Desouza A, et al. Long-term performance of an external stent for saphenous vein grafts: the VEST IV trial. J Cardiothorac Surg 2018;13:117.
47. Smith PK, Shernan SK, Chen JC, et al. Effects of C5 complement inhibitor pexelizumab on outcome in high-risk coronary artery bypass grafting: combined results from the PRIMO-CABG I and II trials. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2011;142:89-98.

Clinical Topics: Acute Coronary Syndromes, Cardiac Surgery, Cardiovascular Care Team, Diabetes and Cardiometabolic Disease, Dyslipidemia, Invasive Cardiovascular Angiography and Intervention, Noninvasive Imaging, Pericardial Disease, Prevention, Stable Ischemic Heart Disease, Aortic Surgery, Cardiac Surgery and SIHD, Hypertriglyceridemia, Lipid Metabolism, Nonstatins, Novel Agents, Statins, Interventions and ACS, Interventions and Imaging, Angiography, Echocardiography/Ultrasound, Nuclear Imaging, Hypertension, Chronic Angina

Keywords: Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors, Blood Pressure, Timolol, Cholesterol, LDL, Patient Discharge, PCSK9 protein, human, Cholesterol, HDL, Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors, Proprotein Convertase 9, Proprotein Convertase 9, Coronary Vessels, Aspirin, Hydrochlorothiazide, Mammary Arteries, Cardiac Rehabilitation, Exercise Test, Exercise Test, Heart Rate, Angina, Stable, Acute Coronary Syndrome, Triglycerides, Hyperlipidemias, Constriction, Pathologic, Pericardial Effusion, Ophthalmic Solutions, Follow-Up Studies, Coronary Artery Bypass, Electrocardiography, Percutaneous Coronary Intervention, Hypotension, Hypertension, Echocardiography, Stents, Ischemia, Diuresis, Hospitals, Angiography

< Back to Listings